Saying No to the Culture of Death

Here is the text in English for those who want to know why Robert Redeker has gone into hiding after he received death threats from members of the Religion of Peace (TM):

What should the free world do while facing Islamist intimidation?

The reactions caused by Benedict XVI’s analysis of Islam and violence highlight the underhanded maneuver carried out by Islam to stifle what the West values more than anything, and which does not exist in any Moslem country: freedom of thought and expression.

Islam tries to impose its rules on Europe : opening of public swimming pools at certain hours reserved exclusively for women, ban on caricaturing this religion, demands for special diets for Muslim children in school cafeterias, struggle to impose the veil at school, accusations of Islamophobia against free spirits.

How can one explain the ban on the wearing thongs on Paris-Beaches* this summer? The reasoning put forth was bizarre: women wering thongs would risk “disturbing the peace”. Did this mean that bands of frustrated youths would become violent while being offended by displays of beauty? Or were the authorities scared of Islamist demonstrations by virtue squads near Paris-Beaches?

However, the authorization of the veil on the street is more disturbing to public peace than wearing a thong, because it invites complaints against the upholding the oppression of women .This ban represents an Islamization of sensibilities in France, a more or less conscious submission to the diktats of Islam. At the very least it is the result of the insidious Muslim pressure on the minds: even those who protested the introduction of a “Jean Paul II Square” in Paris would not be opposed to the construction of mosques. Islam is trying to force Europe to yield to its vision of humanity.

As in the past with Communism, the West finds itself under ideological watch. Islam presents itself, like defunct Communism, as an alternative to the Western world. In the way of Communism before it, Islam, to conquer spirits, plays on a sensitive string. It prides itself on a legitimacy which troubles Western conscience, which is attentive to others: it claims to be the voice of the oppressed of the planet. Yesterday, the voice of the poor supposedly came from Moscow, today it originates in Mecca! Again, today, western intellectuals incarnate the eye of the Koran, as they have incarnated the eye of Moscow. They now excommunicate people because of Islamophobia, as they did before because of anti-communism.

This opening to others, specific to the West, is a secularization of Christianity that can be summarized thus:the other person must come before myself. The Westerner, heir to Christianity, is the that exposes his soul bare. He runs the risk of being seen as weak. With the same ardor as Communism, Islam treats generosity, broadmindedness, tolerance, gentleness, freedom of women and of manners, democratic values, as marks of decadence. They are weaknesses that it seeks to exploit, by means of useful idiots, self-rigtheous consciences drowning in nice feelings, in order to impose the Koranic order on the Western world itself.

The Koran is a book of unparalleled violence. Maxime Rodinson states, in Encyclopedia Universalis, some truths that in France are as significant as they are taboo. On one hand: “Mohammed revealed in Medina unsuspected qualities as political leader and military chief (…) He resorted to private war, by then a prevalent custom in Arabia (….) Mohammed soon sent small groups of partisans to attack the Meccan caravans, thus punishing his unbelieving compatriots and simultaneously acquiring the booty of a wealthy man.”

There is more: “Mohammed profited from this success by eradicating the Jewish tribe which resided in Medina, the Quarayza, whom he accused of suspect behaviour.” And: “After the death of Khadija, he married a widow, a good housewife, called Sawda, and in addition to the little Aisha, barely ten years old. His erotic predilections, held in check for a long time, led him to ten simultaneous marriages .”

A merciless war chief, plunderer, slaughterer of Jews and a polygamist, such is the man revealed through the Koran.

Of , the Catholic church is not above reproach. Its history is strewn with dark pages, for which it has officially repentaed. The Inquisition, the hounding of witches, the execution of the philosophers Giordano Bruno and Vanini, those wrong-thinking Epicureans, in the 18th century the execution of the knight of La Barre for impiety, do not plead in the church’s favor. But what differentiates Christianity from Islam is obvious: it is always possible to go back to true evangelical values, the peaceful character of Jesus as opposed to the deviations of the Church.

None of the faults of the Church have their roots in the Gospel. Jesus is non-violent. Going back to Jesus is akin to forswear the excesses of the Church. Going back to Mahomet, to the conbtrary, reinforces hate and violence. Jesus is a master of love, Mahomet is a master of hatred.

The stoning of Satan, each year in Mecca, is not only an obsolete superstition. It not only sets the stage for a hysterical crowd flirting with barbarity. Its importis anthropological. Here is a rite, which each Muslim is invited to submit to, that emphasizes violence as a sacred duty in the very heart of the believer.

This stoning, accompanied each year by the acciedental trampling to death of some of the believers, sometimes up to several hundreds, is a rite that feeds archaic violence.

Instead of getting rid of this archaic violence, and thus imitating Judaism and Christianity (Judaism starts when it abandons human sacrifice, and enters civilization; Christianity transforms sacrifice through the Eucharist), Islam builds a nest for this violence, where it will incubate. Whereas Judaism and Christianity are religions whose rites spurn violence, by delegitimizing it, Islam is a religion that exalts violence and hatred in its everyday rites and sacred book.

Hatred and violence dwell in the book with which every Muslim is brought up, the Koran. As in the Cold War, where violence and intimidation were the methods used by an ideology hell bent on hegemony, so today Islam tries to put its leaden mantel all over the world. Benedict XVI’s cruel experience is testimony to this. Nowadays, the West has to be called the “free world” in comparison to the Muslim world; likewise, the enemies of the “free world”, the zealous bureaucrats of the Koran’s vision, swarm in the very center of the frre World.

 

Hat Tip: Michelle Malkin

We have a new Tokyo Rose, a traitor to his own country, a willing participant in Jihad, and an Al Qaeda operative. His name is Adam Gadahn and he has made a second tape telling Americans to either convert to Islam or face the consequences. In terms of Jihad, and especially the way in which Jihad was devised by Mohammed in the first place, this new video is very ominous.

The Al Qaeda network must be rubbing their hands with glee because they have their willing dupe who is prepared to issue this form of threat, and is even prepared to carry out the basics of the threat. He is more dangerous than Tokyo Rose, because that woman made statements that were meant to demoralise the troops but this man goes a lot further with his threats.

Adam Gadahn, also known as Azzam al Amrikee, is the second generation American Jihadist, in the same mold as the British born Jihadists in the U.K. and the Australian converts such as Jihad Jack. They are the ones who are much harder to detect because they do not have the same background as the Pakistanis in the U.K. or the Arabs in the USA. They are the face of the future, and that is why we have to take the issued threat very seriously, and be prepared to accept that this form of threat is very ominous.

The new tape contains some of the usual material with its anti-Bush and anti-Blair comments. However, the use of an American dupe is a new and unexpected twist, and this needs further intelligence analysis. What kind of purpose is to be served by getting an American to make such a tape? Our modern Tokyo Rose mentioned the Crusades (the Islamic version of events), the Spanish Inquisition (Muslims did not die during the Inquistions and very few Christians died as a result of the Inquisition, but hey, with all that false history a lot of things do get distorted these days), the deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan. However, the writer forgot to mention that the Jews in Holy Land were killed by the Muslims and the Crusaders came to protect the Holy Land from the hordes of barbarians known as Muslims. He also forgot to mention the number of deaths at the hands of Saddam Hussein, not just the Kurds, but those that mysteriously disappeared during Saddam's reign of terror. He also forgot about the massacres in the Sudan and elsewhere at the hands of Islamics.

It is time that people began to read the Koran and see for themselves that Islam does not mean peace because the real meaning of Islam is submission. The religion of peace brings about a false peace, for those who have been conquered and who refuse to convert to Islam are to be treated as slaves. Any Christian or Jew who refuses to convert has the choice of paying an excessive tax or face death. All who refuse to convert are treated either as Kafir or Dhimmi (those who try to appease their new masters). They are not entitled to hold down any job that is not menial. They are to be treated as second class citizens. They want to impose sharia law, which is the enslavement of the person according to a form of religious fanaticism.

There is little difference between their current desire to impose Sharia, and that of the desire of the Judaizers to impose the Law on the early Gentile Christian converts. The outcome is the same - enslavement to a system of law that is so severe that those who willingly accept the mantle of such a system end up sinning because of all the rules. They become like a people who are spiritually dead due to the rigid adherence to imposed man made laws.

Jihad Tokyo Rose Adam has issued a message to his fellow Jihadis in the USA. The message is meant to convey a warning of "convert" or we will set you on fire. It is as if the message is meant to spark trouble in the USA amongst the Jihadis in the USA, Britain and elsewhere. We need to keep that message in mind because no one who is involved in Islam can really be trusted at this point in time. (secular Muslims are excluded from this statement). We can expect to see an increase in murder suicide actions, and already hundreds of Iraqis have died at the hands of these murder suicide bombers who have no respect for the lives of others.

Islamofacism is very much a part of the culture of death. The mullahs who are inciting the young to violence are men of violence, not of peace. These are not people that we can reason with, and just like Hitler we need to remain awake and not allow our governments to become appeasers who are willing to sacrifice their populations because of their own stupidity when it comes to understanding Islamofacism.

Another little twist in this latest tape has to be the mention of Robert Spencer of Jihad and Dhimmi Watch, as well as Daniel Pipes, and a few others who have been issued with their own personal threat to convert or else. On the other hand the foolish air head George Galloway is seen to be seen a friend of Islam. Some other journalists were also mentioned by name, some because of their writing in opposition to Islamofacism, and the others because of their own stupid support of something that they simply do not understand. These are the left wing journalists whose heads seem to be somewhat vacant because common sense has been missing. They are so dumb that they have not seen how they have become useful tools for the Islamofacists. They have been fawning all over the Palestinians, they took leave of their senses and wrote material in support of Hezbollah and against Israel, and have as a consequence behaved as traitors and enemies of their own countries.